🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.